| Home | Search | Emissions | Pollutants | About the Database |
Valero (26003), Norco
Releases of Sulfur Dioxide
| LDEQ Accident Number Accident Date |
Point Source(s) | Notes | Amount of Release |
| 83352 2005-10-23 | Flare 1 EIQ 15-77; Flare 2 EIQ 12-81 | Cause: The wet gas compressor tripped due to a high level in the suction drum. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by cutting crude rats and restarting the coker WGC. | 8,000.0 pounds |
| 82697 2005-10-01 | Wet Gas Compressor | Cause: Wet gas compressor tripped due to sudden loss of lube oil pressure. Gas processed by compressor was directed to flare. Followup: Yes Notes: Still under investigation - no procedures or preventative measures identified. | 3,008.0 pounds |
| 82120 2005-09-12 | Flare 1 EIQ 15-77; Flare 2 EIQ 12-81 | Cause: Loss of power, control valves failed. Power interruption caused by 3rd party electricity provider. Battery back up system damaged when it received a power surge during restart of refinery after Hurricane Katrina. Followup: Yes Notes: reduced feed rates to our West Plant | 3,641.0 pounds |
| 80318 2005-07-06 | Flare 1 EIQ 15-77; Flare 2 EIQ 12-81 | Cause: Power failure caused a shut down as a result of tropical storm Cindy. Followup: Yes Notes: | Under Investigation |
| 78904 2005-05-07 | Flare 1 EIQ 15-77; Flare 2 EIQ 12-81 | Cause: During startup of unit, one wet gas compressor failed to start as expected due to unanticipated electrical problems. Process gases normally routed through this compressor were diverted to the flare. Followup: No Information Provided Notes: Compressor repaired as quickly as possible.Air filter clogged with debris. Inspection of air filter has been added to preventative maintenance schedule. | 13,646.0 pounds |
| 78487 ; 78475 ; 78488 2005-04-23 | Flare 1 EIQ 15-77 | Cause: MSCCU wet gas compressors tripped due to problems with common lube oil system. Followup: Yes Notes: Reduced feed rate to MSCCU. Issue involves wet gas compressor as seen before. Follow up report sent on June 6, 2005 with remedies: redesign of the nitrogen regulator and replacement of the pressure controller on the lube oil system | 4,292.0 pounds |
| 78141 2005-04-10 | Flare 1 EIQ 15-77 | Cause: Compressor tripped due to low lube oil differntial pressure on the 2nd stage of the compressor. Root cause investigation not complete at the time Followup: Notes: Total pounds emitted from both flares. Remedial actions of reducing feed rate and reducing the reaction temperature so that the offgas to the flare can be reduced. No procedures or preventive measures identified at that time. | 11,033.0 pounds |
| 76469 2005-01-25 | Heater 1501 B | Cause: Tube leak at heater H-1501-B Followup: No Notes: Courtesy notice. Shutting down unit. | |
| 76407 2005-01-24 | Coker wet gas compressor | Cause: The WGC tripped several times due to a high level indication in the interstage drum. This indication was a fase reading due to an accumulation of debris in the level chamber of the radar detector. Followup: Yes Notes: Will place the level chamber on a cleaning schedule to facilitate the removal of debris no later than April 15, 2005. | 23,000.0 pounds |
| 76182 2005-01-13 | No Information Given | Cause: Loss of steam caused by a lack of water from the boiler water feed pumps. Pump suctions were plugged. Yarway valves were worn and were by passing more water to the pump suction drum than expected. Both resulting in low water flow to the boilers. Followup: Yes Notes: NO original incident report in this file. Instituted additional procedures to require personnel to measure pump suction pressure during routine rounds to determine whether or not the pump suction is plugged. Added procedures to monitor the discharge pressure of the Yarway valves to ensure proper operation. INstalled an alarm ont he control valve to indicate for low water discharge. conditions. There was | 12,800.0 pounds |
| 92855 2006-12-27 | Coker unit | Cause: Process safety valve associated with the wet gas compressor in the Coker Unit lifted and diverted gas to the refinery flare system Reason that process safety valve lifted is Under Investigation. Followup: Yes Notes: SO2 released from flares and dispersed. Emissions were minimized by first isolating the PSV and then resealing it. | 2,280.0 pounds |
| 92784 2006-12-20 | Transformer T-2, millisecond catalytic cracking unit | Cause: Transformer T-2, which supplies 480 volt power to certain pieces of equipment in the millisecond catalytic cracking unit (MSCCU), had an internal short circuit. This in turn caused unstable operations in the MSCCU resulting in flaring. Followup: Yes Notes: Restored power to the MSCCU and stabilized operations | |
| 91842 2006-11-03 | Thermal oxidizer stack | Cause: Incline mixer for the sulfer recover units' tail gas treating unit malfunctioned. Led to higher Hydrogen Sulfide gas concentrations being send to the TOX causing it to trip. Also, the temperature in the TOX dropped due to both the TOX trip and loss ofheat from the incline mixer. Precise cause of failure is Under Investigation Followup: Yes Notes: Restarted the TOX ASAP so that any residual H2S could be combusted. Restarted the TGU as soon as practical to minimize SO2 emissions. | 1,315.0 pounds |
| 91199 2006-10-06 | Flare 1, flare 2, thermal oxidizer | Cause: Under Investigation Followup: Yes Notes: Combustion products were rapidly dispersed. There was no apparent offsite impact from the unit shut down. | Under Investigation |
| 90110 2006-08-20 | Uninterruptable power supply in East Plant motor control building went out causing electrical system to go into fail safe mode. | Cause: Uninterruptable power supply in East Plant motor control building No. 8 failed and caused the electrical system to go into fail safe mode. Electrical equipment assocaited with boilers shut down resulting in loss of steam pressure throughout the refinery. In turn, other process units shut down. Excess gas from shutting down units was directed to refinery flare system Followup: Yes Notes: Restarted critical equipmt as quickly as possible to return to normal operation. | Under Investigation |
| 89015 2006-07-02 | Flare 1, flare 2 | Cause: No information given Followup: Not Applicable Notes: | 800.0 pounds |
| 87993 2006-05-20 | GHT flaring (fire) KHT flaring (fire) NHT flaring (fire) DHT liquid burnoff Coker flaring (fire) Coker flaring (SD) | Cause: Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the affected units and the fire was extinguished. | 4,663.0 pounds |
| 87993 2006-05-20 | GHT flaring (fire) KHT flaring (fire) NHT flaring (fire) DHT liquid burnoff Coker flaring (fire) Coker flaring (SD) | Cause: Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the affected units and the fire was extinguished. | 1,429.0 pounds |
| 87993 2006-05-20 | GHT flaring (fire) KHT flaring (fire) NHT flaring (fire) DHT liquid burnoff Coker flaring (fire) Coker flaring (SD) | Cause: Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the affected units and the fire was extinguished. | 2,686.0 pounds |
| 87993 2006-05-20 | GHT flaring (fire) KHT flaring (fire) NHT flaring (fire) DHT liquid burnoff Coker flaring (fire) Coker flaring (SD) | Cause: Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the affected units and the fire was extinguished. | 705.0 pounds |
| 87993 2006-05-20 | GHT flaring (fire) KHT flaring (fire) NHT flaring (fire) DHT liquid burnoff Coker flaring (fire) Coker flaring (SD) | Cause: Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the affected units and the fire was extinguished. | 1,954.0 pounds |
| 87993 2006-05-20 | GHT flaring (fire) KHT flaring (fire) NHT flaring (fire) DHT liquid burnoff Coker flaring (fire) Coker flaring (SD) | Cause: Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the affected units and the fire was extinguished. | 796.0 pounds |
| 87993 2006-05-20 | GHT flaring (fire) KHT flaring (fire) NHT flaring (fire) DHT liquid burnoff Coker flaring (fire) Coker flaring (SD) | Cause: Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the affected units and the fire was extinguished. | 2,367.0 pounds |
| 87975 2006-05-19 | Coker wet gas compressor trip from high level in the interstage drum | Cause: Wet gas compressor tripped due to a high level in the suction drum Gas processed by the compressor was directed to the refinery flare system Followup: Yes Notes: SO2 released from flares and dispersed. Emissions were minimized by cutting coker charge rates, emptying the liquid level to the interstage drum, and restarting the coker WGC. Flaring of gases stopped upon startup of the coker WGC. | 5,600.0 pounds |
| 06-BB017-4036 2006-05-07 | Reduced crude exchangers | Cause: Old boulder feed water preheat line was inadvertently lined up to the reduced crude exchangers. Water was carried from the exchangers to the crude columns. As result, the crude column and the overhead accumulators overpressured and vented to the flare. Followup: No Notes: Locked out and tagged the boiler water feed valves upstream of the reduced crude exchangers. Demolish the old boiler feed water line. | 1,980.0 pounds |
| 86848 2006-03-30 | Vacuum jet tower receiver | Cause: Vacuum tower jet receiver pressured up causing the liquid level in the seal legs to backup and create a higher discharge pressure on the vacuum ring pumps. The increased pressure at the jet receiver resulted in the drum PSV lifting to the flare. The increased pressure on the discharge of the ring pumps cause al 3 pumps to trip on high amps. The ring pumps were drained and restarted at which time the flaring stopped. Exact cause of incident unknown. Followup: No Notes: Emissions were minimized by roperations reducing charge to the unit. The overhead receiver was drained, the ring pumps were de-inventoried to start up level, and the ring pumps were restarted to reestablish the vacuum on the vac tower and stop the flaring of gases. | 1,200.0 pounds |
| 86947 2006-03-29 | Millisecond catalytic cracking unit off gas treatment system | Cause: Due to a problem with off gas treatment system, the off gas did not meet the specification for feedstock use. Therefore, the gas was diverted to the flare while we corrected the problem with the treatment system By visual observation, they discovered that there was another source of gas in the flare. A process safety valve had lifted on the HP overhead receiver for the off gas system The PSV did not reseat automatically. Followup: No Notes: Emissions reduced by making adjustments to the MSCCU to reduce the quantity of off gas produced. | 3,200.0 pounds |
| 85294 2006-01-20 | Uninterrupted power supply system | Cause: UPS system failed causing the power at the DCS consoles to be lost. Resulted in flaring of gases at Flares 1 and 2. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by reestablishing power to the West Plant DCS consolves and reestablishing normal operation as soon as possible. | 4,600.0 pounds |
| 101832 2007-12-19 | #3 Flare | Cause: The Flare Gas Recovery compressors (6-64-101A and 102B) tripped and caused elevated SO2 losses from their #3 flare (EQT 034). Followup: No Notes: Letter states, | |
| 100919 2007-11-09 | EQT 013 and EQT 007 EQT 013 and EQT 007 (Flares #1, 2) | Cause: The Wet Gas Compressor tripped on low oil pressure. Followup: Yes Notes: The incident involved releases on two separate days, 11/09/07 and 11/12/07, but were assigned the same incident Report # by SPOC. | 2,102.0 pounds |
| 100919 2007-11-09 | EQT 013 and EQT 007 EQT 013 and EQT 007 (Flares #1, 2) | Cause: The Wet Gas Compressor tripped on low oil pressure. Followup: Yes Notes: The incident involved releases on two separate days, 11/09/07 and 11/12/07, but were assigned the same incident Report # by SPOC. | 4,559.0 pounds |
| 100919 2007-11-09 | EQT 013 and EQT 007 EQT 013 and EQT 007 (Flares #1, 2) | Cause: The Wet Gas Compressor tripped on low oil pressure. Followup: Yes Notes: The incident involved releases on two separate days, 11/09/07 and 11/12/07, but were assigned the same incident Report # by SPOC. | 2,200.0 pounds |
| 100469 2007-10-24 | Thermal Oxidizer #2, Flares #1,2,3,4 | Cause: On Oct 24, 2007, Valero shut down the West Plant units. There was a communication issue with the Process Logic Controller (PLC) , resulting in the shutdown of the Crude Unit. The shutdown of the Crude Unit cascaded and caused the Vacuum, Coker, and Hydrotreater Units to shutdown as well. Consequently, problems began with the East Plant Units that resulted in flaring and an upset of their SRU 30. Followup: Yes Notes: Since the incident consisted of shutdown events that led to a flaring/incinerating event, the units were restarted as soon as the communication issue was resolved. | |
| 99376 2007-09-12 | Thermal Oxidizer #1 | Cause: On September 12, 2007, Valero had excessive Sulfur Dioxide emissions due ot a process upset in its SRU 3700 unit. Feed to the unit contained a level of hydroCarbon that resulted in a shut down of the Thermal Oxidizer. This oxidizer (3700 TOX) shut down at 20:05 and 20:16 hrs the same day for the same reason. Followup: Yes Notes: Oxygen going to the SRU 3700 was increased in order to stabilize the unit. | |
| 99243 2007-09-06 | Thermal Oxidizer #2 | Cause: In Valero's SRU 30 unit, one of the feeds to the unit contained hydroCarbon, which upset the normal operating parameters in the unit. Consequently, it caused excess Sulfur Dioxide emissions. Followup: Yes Notes: They tried to remove the hydroCarbon in the feed and stabilized the process unit. | |
| 99141 2007-09-03 | Thermal Oxidizer #2 | Cause: On September 3, 2007, Valero encountered process problem in its SRU unit. One of the sulfur traps malfunctioned. Consequently, it caused excess Sulfur Dioxide emissions from the Thermal Oxidizer that were dispersed. Followup: Yes Notes: They cleaned the trap, reseated the ball, and put the sulfur trap back in service. | |
| 98939 2007-08-27 | Thermal Oxidizer | Cause: The Thermal Oxidizer for the Sulfur Recovery unit (that oxidizes Hydrogen Sulfide) tripped, and they struggled to restart it. Followup: No Notes: No reportable quantities were exceeded during this incident, so the notification was to be considered a courtesy. | |
| 98725 2007-08-16 | Thermal Oxidizer #2 (EQT 196 (99-4)) | Cause: In Valero's SRU 30 unit, one of the feeds to the unit contained hydroCarbon, which upset the normal operating parameters in the unit. Consequently, it caused excess Sulfur Dioxide emissions. Followup: Yes Notes: Reduced the feed containing hydroCarbon to the unit and minimized the hydroCarbon in the feed. | |
| 97330 2007-06-24 | EQT 013 and EQT 007; Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: The wet Gas Compressor tripped on low lube oil pressure. This caused the Coker off gas to go to the flare. The cause of this incident is under investigation. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by immediately restarting the Wet Gas Compressor. | 1,126.0 pounds |
| 97168 2007-06-17 | Thermal Oxidizer | Cause: The Thermal Oxidizer tripped, resulting in a release of materials to the air. The materials were released to a flare stack but they were not able to get combustion so they went to the atmosphere. Followup: No Notes: Several reportings: The incident lasted 98 minutes, during which Valero tried to start the unit a couple of times... They had been able to relight the Thermal Oxidizer but still could not say at that point if was stable... The Thermal Oxidizer unit had been up and down and attempts to stabilize had failed several times over.... | |
| 96323 2007-05-17 | Thermal Oxidizer #1 (TOX) and Tail Gas Treating Unit | Cause: The Thermal Oxidizer had tripped and this event might exceed or have exceeded reportable quantities of Sulfure Dioxide. Also, the Tail Gas Treating Unit (TGTU) had tripped and there was a possibility of an Hydrogen Sulfide exceedance. Followup: Yes Notes: Restarted the Thermal Oxidizer and the tail gas unit, reset the level set point to compensate the level indicator error, and replaced the faulty level indicator the next day. They have added the level indicator to their monthly preventive maintenance schedule, completed 6/16/2007. **["May 17, 2007 16:00 to 17:00, H2S (lbs/hr) 157.72, permit limit 0.5, TOX Down for 12 minutes (<700F)] | 1,400.0 pounds |
| 96074 2007-05-09 | Thermal Oxidizer (TOX) #1, Flares #1 and #2 | Cause: On May 9, 2007, Valero shut down its NHT and continuous catalytic reformer (CCR) for repair. While shutting down the units, an additional unit (diesel hydrotreater (HDT)) had to be shut down as well due to lack of hydrogen supply from their third party hydrogen supplier. Thus, they had to shut down their sulfur recovery unit 3700 (SRU) due to insufficient sulfur feed from DHT. When the SRU was down, they kept the reactor hot using hot air sweep, which released SO2 from the sulfur deposited on the reactor bed, through the Thermal Oxidizer. At 9:54, May 15, 2007, they made notifications that the units were stable. Followup: Yes Notes: The incident consisted of NHT, CCR, DHT, and SRU shutdown events. They restarted their SRU as soon as the feed was available. | |
| 95967 2007-05-06 | fluidized catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) | Cause: Valero shut down the fluidized catalytic cracking unit in a controlled shut down process. Followup: No Notes: Completion of repairs to some units were made, then they started up units. They said they would follow up if anything abnormal were to happen. | |
| 94848 2007-03-23 | fluidized catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) | Cause: Valero shut down the fluidized catalytic cracking unit in a controlled shut down process. Followup: No Notes: No information given. | |
| 94654 2007-03-16 | Thermal Oxidizer #1 (TOX) | Cause: On March 16, 2007, Valero shut down its DHT due to a process heat exchanger leak, and thus had to shut down its SRU, 3700, due to insufficient sulfur feed from the DHT. When SRU was down, they kept the reactor warm using hot air sweep, which release sulfure dioxide from the sulfure deposited on the reactor bed, through the Thermal Oxidizer. On March 19, they brought the DHT and SRU back into service. During the start-up of the DHT, the TGTU (tail gas treatment unit) inline mixer at SRU 1600 tripped, which caused excess SO2 emissions as well. Followup: Yes Notes: The incident consisted of DHT and SRU shutdown and TGTU trip events. In the TGTU event, they restarted the TGTU as soon as possible to minimize emissions. | |
| 94577 2007-03-12 | fluidized catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) | Cause: Valero shut down the fluidized catalytic cracking unit in a controlled shut down process to repair flue gas cooler. Followup: No Notes: No information given. | |
| 93013 2007-01-02 | EQT 013 and Eqt 007 | Cause: An LPG line in the East Plant froze, and excess LPG was received in the feed from the Coker to the NHT Unit. The NHT stripper over-pressured and excess gas was diverted to the refinery flare system. Followup: Yes Notes: The Coker LPG pump was shut down to relieve pressure off of the line and rates to the unit were reduced. The pump was restarted, line service was restored and rates were gradually increased. | 5,257.0 pounds |
| 111397 2008-12-12 | MSCCU Reactor Secondary Cyclone | Cause: pinhole leak on MSCCU Reactor Secondary Cyclone Followup: No Notes: Letter states that emission were BRQ. | 287.0 pounds |
| 111397 2008-12-12 | MSCCU Reactor Secondary Cyclone | Cause: pinhole leak on MSCCU Reactor Secondary Cyclone Followup: No Notes: Letter states that emission were BRQ. | 287.0 pounds |
| 110357 2008-10-27 | Flares 1 and 2, Thermal Oxidizer | Cause: power interruption causes upset at East Plant and multiple emissions. Design used purchase power instead of UPS power Followup: Yes Notes: Immediately stabilized process units. Provide uninterruptable power supply instead of purchased power supply to the combustion blowers. PSSR electrical check list will be revised to add a step to physically shut off power to the equipmt to verify that UPS is working properly. | 930.0 pounds |
| 109888 2008-10-07 | TOX 1 and TOX 2 | Cause: failed FBM card leads to 3700 SRU shut down. Followup: No Notes: reduced the crude rate, thereby sulfur load to sulfur units and restarted SRU 3700 as soon as possible. | 3,714.0 pounds |
| 109755 2008-10-01 | Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: Hot Separator develops crack allowing material and gases to release. Followup: No Notes: Emissions minimized with a controlled shutdown of the unit. Firewater sprayed on to control vapors and mitigate inflammation. Oil absorbent booms deployed. Water collected by vacuum truck from drainage routes. | |
| 109312 2008-09-18 | Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: coker wet gas compressor tripped on low lube oil pressure when the main lube oil pump turbine tripped. Followup: No Notes: Incident still under investigation; Follow-up letter cites acquisition of facility from Orion again. | 3,060.0 pounds |
| 109312 2008-09-18 | Coker Wet Gas Compressor | Cause: Coker Wet Gas compressor tripped on low lube oil pressure when the main lube oil pump turbine tripped. This cause Coker off gas to relieve to the flare. Sulfur dioxide was released from the refinery flares and rapidly dispersed. The cause of this incident is under investigation. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by immediately restarting the Wet Gas Compressor. | 3,060.0 pounds |
| 108720 2008-09-05 | Flares | Cause: ; controlled refinery start up due to Gustav Followup: No Notes: Sent to alert outside agencies of possibility of flaring due to start up | |
| 108613 2008-08-30 | Flares | Cause: shutting down some units in anticipation of Gustav Followup: No Notes: Report sent in advance of shut down of some units in preparation for Gustav. Some flaring expected. | |
| 107841 2008-08-07 | Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: while conducting maintenance on the steam system on the compressor, the WGC tripped on low lube oil pressure Followup: No Notes: Emissions minimized by immediately restarting WGC | 3,660.0 pounds |
| 107543 2008-07-26 | Flares | Cause: FCCU lost its air blower and the debutanizers pressurized and relieve to the flares Followup: No Notes: Letter states that emission were BRQ. | 192.0 pounds |
| 106972 2008-07-07 | Thermal Oxidizer #1 (EQT 195 (99-3)) | Cause: an obstruction blocked the #4 run down sulfur trap from closing, allowing vapors to back flow through TOX Followup: No Notes: Letter states that emission were BRQ. | |
| 106285 2008-06-09 | Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: MCCU was shut down so that a pinhole leak on the Millisecond Cat Cracker unit could be repaired Followup: Yes Notes: A plug was installed to minimize the leak. | 425.0 pounds |
| 104831 2008-04-17 | Flares 1 and 2 (EQT 013 and 007) | Cause: difficulty during startup of catalytic cracker and gas Desulfurization Unit Followup: No Notes: Startup rates of units kept low to reduce emissions | 215.0 pounds |
| 103790 2008-03-10 | Flares 1 and 2, Thermal Oxidizer #1, Cooling Tower (CT-04-02) | Cause: start up of Alky and MSCU Units following a major refinery turnaround reveals propane leak. Followup: Yes Notes: Valero secured a Temporary Variance prior to this turnaround. Incident still under investigation at time of report. Follow up letter states that VOC emissions were 1238 lbs/hr, but it does not state how long this emission rate lasted. | |
| 103521 2008-02-29 | Flare | Cause: while initiating corrective actions for another incident the WGC tripped. Followup: No Notes: Emissions minimized by immediately restarting WGC. | 7,800.0 pounds |
| 103290 2008-02-21 | Sour Water Stripper Acid Gas Valve | Cause: pinhole leak on MSCCU Reactor Secondary Cyclone Followup: No Notes: Letter states that emission were BRQ. | |
| 102905 2008-02-08 | East Plant | Cause: East Plant coming down for a scheduled maintenance turnaround Followup: No Notes: Courtesy notification of scheduled turnaround | |
| 102759 2008-02-01 | Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: failure of WGC due to low lube oil pressure Followup: No Notes: Emissions minimized by immediately restarting WGC. | 7,240.0 pounds |
| 102359 2008-01-16 | #1 Flare | Cause: Vacuum tower lost its vacuum Followup: No Notes: Letter states that emission were BRQ. | |
| 102262 2008-01-13 | Flare | Cause: the blow down system off the Wet Gas Compressor was routed to flare to relieve coke drum pressure after one of the coke drums cracks. Followup: No Notes: Letter states that emission were BRQ. | 4.0 pounds |
| 102201 2008-01-10 | Flare Gas Recovery Compressor | Cause: Flare Gas Recovery Compressor tripped Followup: No Notes: Letter states that emission were BRQ. | 20.0 pounds |
| 102102 2008-01-06 | Coker Wet Gas Compressor Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: failure of WGC Followup: No Notes: DEQ report states that there have been many WGC failures, enough that they have made repeated calls to the facility urging them to repair the unit to prevent recurrence of such events. According to report, Valero has repaired the WGC. | |
| 102102 2008-01-06 | Coker Wet Gas Compressor Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: failure of WGC Followup: No Notes: DEQ report states that there have been many WGC failures, enough that they have made repeated calls to the facility urging them to repair the unit to prevent recurrence of such events. According to report, Valero has repaired the WGC. | 6,930.0 pounds |
| 102086 2008-01-03 | Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: Guardian over speed device malfunction causes WGC to trip Followup: No Notes: Emissions minimized by immediately restarting WGC. A series of follow-up reports reveal that Valero did not know age or maintenance history of WGC upon purchase of facility from Orion. Valero has now replaced major components of WGC and plans to replacethe guardian over speed device next. | |
| 120145 2009-12-15 | 3700 TOX (EQT 0195) | Cause: Due to the malfunction of a float switch, the 3700 Sulfur Recovery Unit (3700 SRU) tripped offline at approximately 03:59 on 12/15/09. As a result the SO2 levels at the 3700 Thermal Oxidizer (3700 TOX or EQT 0195)were elevated from approximately 04:03 am to 11:44 am. Followup: Yes Notes: The 3700 SRU feed stream was redistributed and the unit was restarted. | 1,049.9 pounds |
| 118610 2009-10-09 | Thermal Oxidizer #2 (EQT0195) | Cause: Experienced problems with the 3700 Tail Gas Treatment Unit, which resulted in excess emissions from the associated 3700 Thermal Oxidizer (Thermal Oxidizer No 2). Followup: Yes Notes: No Information Given. | 164.0 pounds |
| 118541 2009-10-07 | Fare 1, Flare 2 | Cause: The MSCCU Wet Gas Compressors tripped offline due to a malfunction of their electric and controls systems. Wet gases were relieved through pressure control valves to Flares 1 and 2 in order to maintain safe system pressure. Followup: Yes Notes: Wet gas compressor was restarted. | 2,300.0 pounds |
| 116930 2009-07-30 | No information given. No information given | Cause: Emissions were detected during the start up procedures of refinery process units between 7/30/09 and 8/03/09. Follow up report determined releases were all below reportable quantities and did not give any more information. Followup: Yes Notes: Feed was pulled from malfunctioning units. | |
| 115395 2009-07-02 | Flares 1, Flare 2 | Cause: While performing a preventative maintenance check. While checking voltage output levels on the power supplies in the control cabinets an arc was created that shut down both power supply #1 an #2. The loss of both power supplies caused the redundant controllers to power down, which shutdown the Coker Wet Gas Compressor sending material to the flare. Followup: Yes Notes: Wet gas compressor was immediately restarted | 4,241.5 pounds |
| 115515 2009-06-09 | Fire Flare 1 and 2 | Cause: High temperature sulfide corrosion caused a pipe in vacuum tower bottom service to fail. The leak combusted, process units were upset, and ultimately shut down. Shutdown caused emission from flare. Followup: Yes Notes: After the fire was discovered, crude/vacuum/coker processes were suhut down and the units were depressurized to flare. | 13,095.0 pounds |
| 115515 2009-06-09 | Fire Flare 1 and 2 | Cause: High temperature sulfide corrosion caused a pipe in vacuum tower bottom service to fail. The leak combusted, process units were upset, and ultimately shut down. Shutdown caused emission from flare. Followup: Yes Notes: After the fire was discovered, crude/vacuum/coker processes were suhut down and the units were depressurized to flare. | 4,839.0 pounds |
| 114193 2009-04-16 | Flare No. 1, Flare No. 2 | Cause: Refinery cooling water tower CT-405 experienced a valve malfunction which resulted in a loss of cooling water to our Naphtha Hydrotreating unit (NHT). Due to the lack of cooling water, our NHT stripper overhead pressure increased and caused PSV-39-235 to relieve to the flare. Simultaneously when the CT-405 valve malfunction, the recirculating cooling water was released from the basin to the ground and flowed offsite. Followup: No Notes: | 1,807.0 pounds |
| 113868 2009-04-01 | Flare No. 1, Flare No. 2 | Cause: Power outage due to instrumentation control processors in MSCCU and Alky units. As a result, these units were upset and relieved to the Flares. Power was restored and units brought back on line. Followup: No Notes: Once power was restored, Valero operations moved quickly to return to stable operating conditions. Limits for Sulfur Dioxide were exceeded, but no information on quantity was given. | |
| 113223 2009-03-06 | Thermal Oxidizer #2, Flare No 1, Flare No, 2 | Cause: Lost primary and alternate power to instrumentation control processers for East Plant. Control valves and other I/O failed to their last recorded position during the power outage. When power was restored, control valves and other I/O returned to their pre-programmed settings causing some process upsets and equipment shutdowns. Followup: No Notes: Power restored and controllers returned to stable conditions. | |
| 128357 2010-12-27 | FLARE: flare #1 & #2 | Cause: Wet gas compressor (WGC) in the delayed coking unit malfunctioned resulting in SO2 emissions to Flares #1 and #2. A level indicator on the coker tower HCGO tray malfunctioned. FLARE. Followup: Yes Notes: RQ. Reportable quantities for sulfur dioxide were exceeded. See Root Cause Analysis for more information. DLEQ report, Refinery letter, and follow-up letter all included in file. | 4,529.0 pounds |
| 126165 2010-09-06 | 3700 Sulfur Recovery Unit, 3700 Thermal Oxidizer | Cause: Valve malfunction on 3700 Sulfur Recovery Unit resulted in sulfur dioxide elevated levels at 3700 Thermal Oxidizer. Followup: Yes Notes: RQ. Refinery letter states that the permitted SO2 rate and reportable quantity were exceeded. Workers diverted 3700 SFU feed stream to other Sulfur Recovery units, took manual control, and restarted unit. Refinery letter only; letter states that this is second follow-up report, but no first report is included in file. No LDEQ report. | 3,454.0 pounds |
| 126017 2010-08-30 | 3700 Sulfur Recovery Unit, 3700 Thermal Oxidizer | Cause: Malfunction of main air blower on 3700 Sulfur Recover Unit cause elevated sulfur dioxide levels at the 3700 Thermal Oxidizer (EQT 0195). Followup: No Notes: Report states that 6 part remedial action was taken to prevent future incidents, including operator training, equipment repair, and additional administrative controls. Refinery letter only; letter states that this is second follow-up report, but no other letter included. No LDEQ report. | 1,165.9 pounds |
| 124653 2010-07-07 | FLARE: Sulfur Recovery Unit (SRU) | Cause: Incident involved a release of Sulfur Dioxide during the start up of their 1600 Sulfur Recovery Unit. FLARE. Followup: No Notes: BRQ. The facility determined that 157 lbs. of Sulfur Dioxide (RQ. is 500 lbs) was released on 7/7/10, between the hours of 0500 and 0600. The permitted SO2 under EQT 0358 is 300 lb/hr. | 621.0 pounds |
| 123734 2010-05-25 | FLARE: MSCCU | Cause: Small hole in Milli-Second Catalytic Cracking Unit (MSCCU)--had to flare when shutting down for repair. FLARE. Followup: No Notes: BRQ. Refinery letter states that no reportable quantities were exceeded. No information given regarding remedial actions. | |
| 122464 2010-03-30 | FLARE: flare #1 | Cause: Elevated sulfur compounds at Flare #1. FLARE. Followup: Yes Notes: Ongoing testing/monitoring of elevated sulfur compounds in the flare during the week. Unclear if emissions had ceased at time of LDEQ report. | 2,870.0 pounds |
| 121805 2010-02-27 | FLARE: Flare #1 & #2, MSSCU, SRU, 3700 TOX | Cause: Flaring caused by difficulty starting up the Millisecond Catalytic Cracking Unit (MSCCU), as well as the Sulfur Recovery Unit (SRU) and its related thermal oxidizer (TOX) after a maintenance shutdown.
Some emissions exceeded visible emissions and opacity permit limits as well. Followup: Yes Notes: RQ. Refinery letter states that reportable quantities were exceeded for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and hydrogen sulfide. Initial refinery letter, plus two additional follow-up reports included in file. Remedial actions: "Maximized steam to flares to mitigation visible emissions...and adjusted feed rates and other process parameters in order to complete startup and stabilize the MSCCU and 3700 SRU units." "A minimal amount of waste gas is expected to be flared during process startup. Currently this activity is permitted for expected losses of criteria pollutants and hydrogen sulfide. Since the loss of propylene is not permitted under startup emissions, but is expected, Valero will request propylene allowances in a future application for a permit modifications. Additionally, we are planning to install flare gas recovery compressors on Flares 1 and 2 in the year 2011. These compressors will have the ability to capture waste gasses generated from startup activities and return them to the refinery fuel gas system." | 34,598.0 pounds |
| 133803 2011-09-04 | 3700 and 30 SRU | Cause: The sulfur dioxide levels at 3700 and 30 unit thermal oxidizers were elevated due to failure of a pressure transmitter on the 3700 unit overhead accumulator. Valero estimated that the RQ for sulfur dioxide was exceeded at approximately 1:10 am and the RQ for hydrogen sulfide was not exceeded. The failing transmitter gave false indications in both the overhead accumulator pressure and the stripper overhead pressure. This prompted operational moves in the unit to shift loads in an effort to return the SRUs to stead operation. Followup: Yes Notes: After the local pressure gauges in the field were verified, it was determined that a single pressure indication was malfunctioning and operational moves were made to restore normal operating conditions. The following corrective actions were identified to prevent recurrence of this incident: (1)Repair both the overhead accumulator and the stripper overhead pressure transmitters and have separate pressure readings on the DCS. (2)Revise the DCS page to reflect both pressure indications. (3) Ensure the DCS and logic changes are covered by the management of change (MOC) process. (4) Conduct training with Operators on this incident. (5)Have the pressure control valve 37-4182-A inspected during the 2014 turnaround. | 1,333.5 pounds |
| 131890 2011-06-18 | T-50-3 | Cause: A higher capacity pump was used on June 17th, the night before the incident, to pump down the level of spent sulfuric acid in the alkylation unit degassing drum to T-50-3 and exceeded the capacity of the tank's thermal oxidizer (TO). When the pressure exceeded the PVRV set point (24 oz/sq inches) the accumulated gases were vented to the atmosphere. Tk50-3 Followup: Yes Notes: The flow of spent acid from the alkylation unit to T-50-3 was stopped allowing the pressure within the tank to decrease below the set point of the PVRV. The PVRV was subsequently monitored to check that it had completely closed after the pressure decreased to normal levels. Valero identified the following corrective actions: (1) Install downstream flow monitor on spent acid rundown line so operators can monitor the rate of spent acid rundown. (2) Reroute acid pot flush from the degassing drium to the spend acid settler to reduce hydrocarbon carry through. (3) Maintain level in the spent acid degassing drum at 20% or greater when pumping to T-50-3. (4) Set alarm on the spent acid Coriolis meter density to stop or reduce spent acid flow when hydrocarbon carry through appears likely. (5) Evaluate increasing PVRV set pressure from 1/5 psig on T-50-3. (6) Evaluate increasing the size of the TO on T-50-3 to handle additional vapor load. | 170.0 pounds |
| 131491 2011-05-27 | 1600 TOX | Cause: Due to failure of a pressure relief device, the refinery's 1600 TOX tripped and resulted in elevated sulfur dioxide levels. They estimate that the reportable quantities for sulfur dioxide were exceed around 10:45 am on 5/27/11. Based upon a failure analysis conducted by the manufacturer, it is believed that the device experienced an instantaneous pressure increase which cause the device to burst below the marked burst pressure. Followup: Yes Notes: Operators blocked in the process line with the malfunctioned device and restarted the TOX. The following corrective actions have been identified to prevent recurrence of this incident: (1) Develop Installation Guidelines, based upon manufacturer recommendations, to ensure devices are properly installed in the field (2) Develop Operating Guidelines, based upon manufacturer recommendations, for controlling the pressurization rate seen by the device through proper valve operation (3) Conduct training with Maintenance and Operations personnel on the two above established guidelines. The permitted maximum hourly sulfur dioxide rate and reportable quantity were exceeded. The concentration limit (250 ppm/ 12 h) was not exceeded. | 973.0 pounds |
| 131415 2011-05-20 | 30, 3700, and1600 Unit Thermal Oxiders, Flares 1 and 2 1600 TOX and Flares 1 and 2 Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: Due to multiple equipment high levels during startup of the Gasoline Desulfurizing Unit (GDU), hydrocarbons were introduced into the refinery's sulfur dioxide removal system and to the Sulfur Recovery Units (SRU) feeds resulting in unit upsets. Sulfur dioxide levels at the 1600, 3700 and 30 Unit Thermal Oxidizers were elevated from 3:24 pm on 5/20/11 until 8:00 am on 5/21/11. This caused smoking from the 1600 TOX stack from approximately 3:55 until 4:10 and the unit was shut down during this time. The 3700 and 30 Unit TOXs were also shutdown at approximately 3:40 and 4:13 respectively. Additionally, these process upsets also impacted the refinery's fluid catalytic cracking unit resulting in flaring for portions of this incident. Followup: Yes Notes: Valero did not show their limit for SO2, CO, NOx, PM, and VOC in the Thermal Oxidizer and flarecap. No limit was shown for Benzene in the Thermal Oxidizer. No limit was shown for H2S and Propylene in the flarecap. Accurate estimates could not be made. All values are below the total emitted and may be grossly deflated. During the event Valero received an odor complaint and took action to prevent and minimize any public nuisance. Field monitoring did not reveal any detectable quantities of VOCs or sulfur dioxide. Operational moves were made to the sulfur recover plants to shutdown the thermal oxidizers safely. Operators maximized steam to the refinery flares to mitigate visible emissions. During the incident fence-line monitoring was conducted by Valero and there were no detectable concentrations found. The following corrective actions were identified to prevent recurrence of this incident: (1) Modify the startup procedure for the GDU to ensure a shift supervisor monitors the unit radio channel (2) Include in the SRU standing orders that amine upsets be communicated to the shift supervisor and the shift superintendent (3) Modify GDU SOP's to amplify actions required for the amine system (4) Configure a separate console to receive all GDU alarms (5) Implement alarm management to allow high priority alarms to be flagged (6) Consider installing an auto shut off on the amine absorbers bottoms plant wide (7) Consider installing a bypass on the feed to untreated gasoline storage to improve feed control to the GDU during start up (8) Train the SRU operators on the rich DEA flash drum weir configurations. The hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide permitted rates and reportable quantities were exceeded. There were released of nitric oxide, benzene, and VOCs released above reportable quantities. Opacity and visible emission limits were exceeded for flares 1 and 2 and the GRP007 SRU/TOCAP-SRU TO/CAP. The SRU sulfur dioxode concentration limit (250 ppm/ 12 h) for 30 and 1600 Unit TOXs and the EP and WP Fuel Gas hydrogen sulfide (162 ppm/3 h) were also exceeded. | 12,495.4 pounds |
| 130162 2011-03-24 | 3700 SRU Malfunction | Cause: The sulfur dioxide levels at the 3700 Thermal Oxidizer (EQT 0195) were intermittently elevated from approximately 3/24/11 from 8:40 am until 11:30 am. Valero estimates that the reportable quantity for sulfur dioxide was exceeded at 9:25 am. This event was attributed to a miscommunication between night and day-shift operators, as well as process pressure controller that needed calibration (tuning). Followup: Yes Notes: Operators moved quickly to make manual control over automatic control valves that may have contributed to this event. Operational moves were conducted on a separate sulfur recover plant to help stabilize the upset. The following measures have been identified to help prevent recurrence:(1) Tune pressure controller for amine acid gas header to 3700 SRU (2) Communicate incident and reinforce the use of shift notes when communicating important details | 1,573.0 pounds |
| 130150 2011-03-23 | 30 sulfur recovery unit | Cause: On 3/24/11, LDEQ was notified by the Valero St. Charles Refinery that the reportable quantity for sulfur dioxide may have been exceeded during the startup of the 30 Sulfur Recovery Unit. According to the follow-up notification letter submitted by Valero this was a courtesy notification. No reportable quantities were exceeded as a result of this release. Followup: No Notes: No Information Given. | |
| 144411 2012-11-05 | Flare 1 and 2 | Cause: The wet gas compressor in the delayed coking unit had malfunctioned. Followup: Yes Notes: The maximum hourly permitted emissions for hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide exceeded the maximum hourly permitted emissions. Gas from the coker was combusted in Flare 1 and Flare 2. The resulting combustion byproducts rapidly dispersed. Emissions were minimized by restarting the wet gas compressor. The incident will be communicated to all affected personnel. The XY-53325 A and B solenoids as well as the XY-53325A relay will be replaced during the text outage. Wiring in the compressor control cabinet will be upgraded to separate critical wiring from general purpose wiring. | 3,142.0 pounds |
| 143663 2012-10-08 | NIG | Cause: The Hydrotreater Hydrocracker (HTHC) unit had malfunctioned resulting in excess SO2 emissions at Flares 1 and 4. A feed pump motor shutdown due to an inboard bearing failure causing all four of the HTHC heaters to trip. When the HTHC heaters tripped, the LCO reactor lost its heat input to the top of the hydrotreating bed. With the loss of the heat input, the quench valve automatically began to close with the change in the bed inlet temperature causing less hydrogen to be fed into the stream creating a change in the hydrogen/oil ratio and ammonia in the vapor phase. In addition, there was tray damage in the LCO reactor causing flow maldistribution which compounded the issue. Thus, the change in composition and flow maldistribution caused increased cracking and significant temperature increase in a subsequent bed. The temperature increase in the subsequent bed activated the high rate depressurization of the HTHC unit. Followup: Yes Notes: Gas from the HTHC was combusted in Flare 1 and 4 and the resulting combustion byproducts rapidly dispersed. A quantity of the material was recovered through the fuel gas recovery unit on the flare system. The reportable quantity for SO2 was exceeded as a result of this incident. In addition, the max hourly permitted emissions for SO2 were exceeded at Flares 1 and 4. Operations will implement a guidance document to reduce set points by 15 degrees Fahrenheit on loss of LCO charge heater. Cracking beds operation stability will be improved by limiting the temperature delta. A high priority alarm to the DCS will be added. The logic in the DCS will be revised to eliminate the inlet temperature trips. | 1,718.0 pounds |
| 142968 2012-09-13 | Wet Gas Compressor | Cause: The Wet Gas Compressor (WGC) in the delayed coking unit had malfunctioned resulting in excess SO2 emissions at Flares 1 and 2.
The WGC malfunction was caused by a loss of power to the Bentley Nevada (B/N) Control Panel. The B/N Panel is powered by two separate supply feeders, each having a breaker. Maintenance personnel who were investigating the WGC malfunction found that both power source breakers to the B/N panel had tripped causing the WGC to lose power, which resulted in flaring. It could not be determined if both breakers tripped at the same time or if one had failed earlier eliminating the redundancy. Maintenance personnel could not find any issues inside the B/N panel so they reset the breakers and restored the power to the panel. The WGC compressor was reset and restarted without further issue.
This event is considered reasonably unforeseeable and therefore qualifies as an "upset." Followup: Yes Notes: Gas from the coker was combusted in Flare 1 and 2 and the resulting combustion byproducts rapidly dispersed. Emissions were minimized by restarting the wet gas compressor. In the future, the facility will communicate the incident to all affected personnel. They will install a power monitoring system that will trigger an alarm on the Distributed Control System (DCS) if one of the power system fails. They will also install breakers separated by a physical gap on the power supply. Finally, they will review other Bentley Nevada systems in the refinery for similar issues. The reportable quantity for SO2 was exceeded. | 12,643.0 pounds |
| 141595 2012-07-27 | wet gas compressor | Cause: The wet gas compressor in the delayed coking unit malfunctioned resulting in excess H2S and SO2 emissions at Flares 1 and 2. Followup: Yes Notes: On the day of the incident, the steam control valve that regulated the turbine speed for the Coker WGC to account for increased gas flow rates due to an upstream process upset. When this upset was corrected, the gas flow to the WGC decreased and operators began closing the steam control valve for the steam turbine to reduce the speed of the WGC due to this lower gas flow. However, the steam control valve did not provide adequate response and did not result in a change in turbine speed. The WGC ultimately shutdown when the turbine reached its protective overspeed trip point and stopped all steam flow to the turbine. This happened very quickly and no further adjustments to the steam control valve before the turbine tripped. Emissions were minimized by restarting the wet gas compressor. This incident will be communicated to all affected personnel. The facility will install a control clamp at 80% on the steam control valve output to prevent a delayed control response due a dead band on the valve. A team will also be created from operations, controls, process, and reliability to monitor and record events in the Trilogger and review with the process control design team on a biweekly basis to control performance and tune as necessary. There is a discrepancy regarding the incident date. The subject lists the incident date as 07/27/2012, while the written notification states that it occurred on June 27, 2012. | 6,024.0 pounds |
| 141519 2012-06-25 | bulk air valve on the 3700 sulfur recovery unit furnace | Cause: SO2 was released due to a malfunction of the bulk air valve on the 3700 sulfur recovery unit furnace. Followup: No Notes: In a previous report that LABB does not have access to, this release was classified as reportable quantity; however, after further consideration, it was determined that no reportable quantity had been exceeded. 304 pounds of SO2 was released and will be captured in the semiannual deviation report. Discrepancy with the incident date. The subject information states the incident date as 07/25/2012, while the report says June 25,2012. The report does not state whether the previous notification was verbal or written. If it was verbal, and this incident occurred on June 25, the report would have been made more than 7 days after the incident occurred. | 304.0 pounds |
| 140457 2012-06-13 | wet gas compressor | Cause: The Wet Gas Compressor malfunctioned when operators were warming Coke Drum D. Shortly after switching to Coke Drum D, pressure on the unit spiked and the Fractionator overhead became overloaded. The temperature increased 20 degrees and caused the Interstage drum to become overwhelmed with condensing liquid. The compressor tripped on high interstage level resulting in flaring. Followup: Yes Notes: As a result of this incident, the maximum hourly combined permitted emissions for H2S and SO2 were exceeded as well as the reportable quantity. Emissions were minimized by restarting the wet gas compressor. The facility will now hold an operations stand down with each shift to review the incident and stress the importance of following all standard operating procedures. The facility is also adding a line to the console check sheet to verify that the tap water is blocked in before warming up drums prior to switching drums. | 1,037.0 pounds |
| 140445 2012-06-12 | 3700 SRU TGTU inline mixer | Cause: A malfunction of the 3700 sulfur recovery unit (SRU) tail gas treater unit (TGTU) inline mixer occurred resulting in excess sulfur dioxide emissions. Followup: Yes Notes: Excess sulfur dioxide emissions resulting from the 3700 SRU TGTU inline mixer malfunction were emitted through the 3700 TOX stact to the environment and rapidly dispersed. The 3700 SRU TGTU inline mixer was restarted. Measures to prevent recurrence will be identified as part of a pending investigation. Initial reports indicated that this release was reportable quantity, but a report sent on June 26th, 2012 indicates that no reportable quantity has been exceeded. Emissions associated with this malfunction event were 450 pounds of SO2 and will be captured in the semiannual deviation report. | 450.0 pounds |
| 140250 2012-06-05 | wet gas compressor | Cause: The wet gas compressor in the delayed coking unit malfunctioned resulting in excess H2S and SO2 emissions at Flares 1 and 2. Followup: No Notes: Gas from the coker was combusted in flare 1 and flare 2 and the resulting combustion byproducts rapidly dispersed. Emissions were minimized by restarting the wet gas compressor. The incident is still under investigation. No procedures or preventative measures have been identified at this time. | 1,160.0 pounds |
| 140182 2012-06-01 | 3700 TOX thermal oxidizer | Cause: A malfunction of the 3700 thermal oxidizer (TOX)occurred resulting in excess sulfur dioxide emissions. Followup: No Notes: Excess sulfur dioxide emissions resulting from the TOX malfunction were emitted through the 3700 TOX stack to the environment and rapidly dispersed. The 3700 TOX was restarted. Measures to prevent recurrence will be identified as part of a pending investigation. | 686.7 pounds |
| 140047 2012-05-26 | wet gas compressor | Cause: The wet gas compressor in the delayed coking unit had malfunctioned resulting in excess SO2 emissions at flares 1 and 2. Followup: Yes Notes: Gas from coker was combusted in Flare 1 and Flare 2 and the resulting combustion byproducts rapidly dispersed. Emissions were minimized by restarting the wet gas compressor. This incident is still under investigation. No procedures or preventative measures have been identified at this time. A "30 day follow up report" was submitted on February 28, 2013 citing that the root cause failure analysis report had been submitted for the incident. The document only lists 3 actions Valero plans on taking: "1. We will communicate this incident to all affected personnel. 2. Operations will implement a guidance document to reduce set points by 15 degrees Fahrenheit on loss of LCO charge heater. 3. Improve cracking beds operation stability by limiting the temperature delta. Add a high priority alarm to the DCS." The February 28th letter does not provide the root cause of the accident. | 1,214.0 pounds |
| 139226 2012-04-30 | Wet gas compressor | Cause: The Wet Gas Compressor in the delayed coking unit at Valero St. Charles Refinery malfunctioned resulting in excess SO2 emissions at flares 1 and 2. Followup: Notes: Refinery fuel gas was combusted in Flare 1 and Flare 2 and the resulting combustion byproducts rapidly dispersed. Emissions were minimized by restarting the wet gas compressor. This incident is still under investigation. No procedures or preventative measures have been identified at this time. | 768.0 pounds |
| 138677 2012-04-08 | No information given | Cause: The 1600 Sulfur Recovery Unit (16 SRU) tripped and went offline for about 2.5 hours. It is suspected that SO2 and H2S levels were elevated at the associated thermal oxidizer (1600 TOX-EQT241). The exact cause is under investigation. Followup: Yes Notes: These emissions will be reported in the Refineries Title V permit compliance reports. In the first written follow up report, it is suspected that the rate and reportable quantities of SO2 and H2S were exceeded. The SO2 concentration limit may have also been exceeded. The opacity standard may have been exceeded for 2 hours and 34 minutes. In the follow up report sent May 3, 2012, the values were calculated as below reportable quantity. | 320.0 pounds |
| 137347 2012-02-20 | FLARE: Unspecified flare coming from PSVs on compressors K-14-02A and K-14-02B | Cause: Hydrocarbon flaring was coming from PSVs located on compressors K-14-02A and K-14-02B in the Alkylation unit. Followup: No Notes: Fenceline monitoring was conducted to determine impacts to surrounding areas. The results of monitoring are contained in an attachment to the file. The attachment shows no impact. | |
| 152289 2013-11-11 | Flare 1 | Cause: On November 11, 2013, the Valero St. Charles Refinery experienced flared while making repairs on the Coker Jet Pump, which supplies water to the coke drums during the coke cutting process. Portable pumps were installed during the repairs but kept tripping due to vibration issues. Therefore, we cut feed to the coker and the heaters were put on circulation. The decreased fee into the Coker Unit from the Vacuum Unit caused the Wet Gas Compressor (WGC) to trip, which caused flaring. When the WGC tripped, pressure started to build up on the Vacuum Jet Receiver. To prevent the Vacuum Jet Receiver pump from tripping and causing a loss of vacuum in the vacuum distillation column, the backpressure on the jet receiver was relieved to the flare until the WGC stabilized.
The pressure control valve on the vacuum jet receiver was open to the flare for approximately one hour, but intermittent flaring ensued until the rates in the coker unit could be increased to provide the WGC with enough gas to operate normally. Followup: Yes Notes: First written report states that emissions were minimized by reducing rates and installing a spare vacuum jet overhead pump. The incident occurred due to the inability to maintain operation of the COker WGC which pulls gases from the Coker and Vacuum Units. While the WGC was down, the Vacuum Jet Receiver was vented to the flare in order to maintain unit operation and avoid a larger flaring event associate with the unit trip. Additionally, the Flare Gas Recovery Unit remained in operation to reduce the amoin of flared gas. The event was secured by completing repairs on the coker and stabilizing the WGC. The following corrective measures were taken to prevent recurrence: 1) Review this incident with affected personnel. 2) Evaluate the piping system for use with temporary jet pumps and redesign as needed to minimize vibration issues. 3) Develop a reliability improvement plan that is based on the findings of the investigation into the jet pump failure. 4) Implement a reliability improvement plan on both in-service and spare coke cutting pumps. 5) Review the WGC operation for continued use at low rates or when the Coker is on circulation. We exceeded the reportable quantity of SO2 as a result of the incident. | 2,232.0 pounds |
| 151623 2013-10-14 | 1600 Sulfur Recovery Unit | Cause: On Monday October 14, 2013, at approximately 14:15 hrs, we made notification that we potentially exceeded a reportable quantity for sulfur dioxide due to a malfunction of the 1600 sulfur recovery unit (SRU). After further investigation, we have determined that no reportable quantity has been exceed resulting from this incident. Followup: Notes: Air monitoring conducted with the refinery and along the fence line of the refinery downwind of the prevailing wind direction revealed no appreciable SO2 concentrations (0 ppmv SO2). Report states that excess emissions will be captured in a future Title V report. | 49.2 pounds |
| 150290 2013-08-09 | Flares 1,2,3,4&5; FCCU; GDU; Boiler B-401C, B-401D, & 401-E Flares 1,2,3,4&5; FCCU; GDU; Boilers B-401C & B-401D Flares 1,2,3,4&5; 30, 1600, & 3700 TOX; FCCU; GDU; Boilers B-401C, B-401D, & 401-E Flares 1,2,4&5; 30, 1600, & 3700 TOX; Coker No. 2 Steam Vent Flares 1,2,3,4&5; Coker No. 2 Steam Vent; Boilers B-401C, B-401D, & 401-E Flares 1,2,3,4&5 Flares 1,2,3,4&5; Coker no. 2 Steam Vent Flares 1,2,4&5; Coker no. 2 Steam Vent Coker No. 2 Steam Vent 6d 14hr 24m | Cause: On August 9, 2013, at approximately 22:51 hrs, Valero experienced an interruption in power supply caused by a surge arrestor electrical fault. The interruption caused the shutdown of multiple process units and resulted in excess emissions from the boilers, Sulfur Recovery Units (SRUs), Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU), Gasoline Desulfurization Unit (GD), Coker Unit, and refinery flares.
During recovery process of the power loss event, shutdowns occurred to both the Hydrocracker unit (HCU) and Ultra-low sulfur diesel unit (ULSD) resulting in flaring. Both unit shutdowns were related to the shutdown of their recycle gas compressors. The HCU's recycle gas compressor malfunctioned due to a low steam pressure which was directed related to the power loss event. The ULSD shutdown due to a malfunction of the recycle gas compressor's primary lube oil pump, and a delayed response for the startup of the secondary lube oil pump. We are unable to determine if the shutdown of the ULSD was directed related to the power loss event. However, the emission contributed to the HCU and ULSD shutdowns are considered as part of the same power loss event and are included herein. Followup: Yes Notes: The power loss caused the Crude Unit and Vacuum Unit to shut down immediately, thus preventing the manufacture of intermediates that feed subsequent process units. Downstream units were placed in circulation mode through manually closing valves, lowering reactor temperature and restarting tripped equipment such as compressors and pumps. Steam production was also increased as available to allow units to continue in circulation mode until power was restored. The HCU and ULSD units were re-started to reduce excess emissions. In addition, the flare gas recovery unit remain in operation during the entire incident to reduce the amount of flared gas. To prevent recurrence, the following procedures will be adopted: 1) Perform thermal scans of the surge arrestors in the Prospect and Good Hope Substation yards. 2) Perform routine thermal scans of the surge arrestors in the Prospect and Good Hope Substation yards. 3) Complete the evaluation of all existing Valero owned surge arrestors in the Prospect and Good Hope Substation yards to determine if they are of the same age and model of the T3 arrestors that have shown signs of degradation. To data, the surge arrestors on T4 transformers have been identified as being of the same vintage and design as the failed arrestors and will be the first targeted for replacement as will all arrestors of this design. 4) Evaluate one of the non-failed surge arrestors removed from service to determine if any degradation has started to occur. 5) Develop a plan to routinely replace all surge arrestors in 230KV service at 10 year intervals. 6) Review this incident and emergency procedures with affect personnel. 7) Evaluate raising the autostart pressure setting on the auxiliary lube oil pump. 8) Evaluate increasing the trip time delay on the low-low lube oil shutdown. 9) Consider installing a valve on the make-up hydrogen at the ULSD unit battery limits to prevent fresh hydrogen from being introduced to the unit during a period of malfunction. 10) Add to existing Emergency Operation Procedure to account for Diamond Green Diesel, which is connected to the ULSD. 11) Contact corporate hydrocracking specialists to determine if the logic should be modified to initiate high rate depressurization upon loss of recycle gas compressor. Reportable quantities were exceeded for H2S, SO2, NOx, and VOCs. | 71,472.0 pounds |
| 149758 2013-07-17 | Flare 1,2 | Cause: Valero experienced intermittent flaring from Flares 1 and 2 when the slop oil degassing drum exceeded the capacity of our flare gas recovery system.
On July 17, 2013 intermittent flaring from flares #1 and #2 started. The source was initially unknown and being investigated. The flaring was discovered to be associated with the startup of the hydrocracker unit, which began on July 12, 2013. Per startup procedure, off-spec product (naptha)was rerouted to the rerun tank, which allows the recovery and reprocessing of this material. On the way to the rerun tank, the naptha was degassed to the flare header so that the light hydrocarbons are kept out of the tank. Normally, these light hydrocarbons are then collected by flare gas recovery and returned to our fuel gas system. However, after about four days after the startup procedure was initiated, these vapors exceeded the capacity of the flare gas recovery system, causing intermittent flaring from flares #1 and #2. The flaring ceased when the off-spec product was routed to the gasoline blending tanks instead of the rerun tank. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by localizing and redirecting the source of the flare gas to another unit. In addition, the flare gas recovery unit remained in operation to reduce the amount of flared gas. The following corrective actions have been identified to prevent recurrence: 1) Review this incident with affected personnel and attach a sign-off sheet. 2) Revise the startup procedures to address this situation. | 3,769.0 pounds |
| 148993 2013-06-04 | debutanizer column vent | Cause: On June 4, 2013 at approximately 0930 hrs, the loss of heat medium in the debutanizer column caused controlled venting of sulfur dioxide and propylene. Followup: No Notes: A notification was made that a reportable quantity for sulfur dioxide and propylene was exceeded. After further review, it was determined that no reportable quantity has been exceeded resulting from this incident. Emissions associated with this malfunction will be captured in the Title V semiannual deviation report. | 290.0 pounds |
| 148110 2013-04-14 | Flares 1, 2, and 4 | Cause: On April 14, 2013, at approximately 07:Sl, the Coker WGC malfunctioned, resulting in a unit shutdown and a release to the flare of approximately 47,S36 pounds of sulfur dioxide and 144 pounds of hydrogen sulfide. The WGC tripped offline and could not be restarted due to a malfunction of the compression thrust bearing. Monitoring of the compression thrust data did not indicate prior degradation of the bearing. The bearing is believed to have failed from steam
condensation due to a boiler malfunction approximately 2S minutes before the WGC tripped. The boiler malfunction caused the steam temperature to drop to the saturation point. Additionally, there was missing and damaged insulation found along the steam header upstream of the WGC. The missing insulation along with the heavy rain that was in the area during the time of the incident could have contributed to the drop in steam temperature to the saturation point. Emissions were minimized by reducing the crude rate by approximately SO percent and by
shutting down the delayed coker unit. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by reducing the crude rate by approximately 50% and by shutting down the delayed coker unit. Follow up report details procedures or measures which have or will be adopted to prevent recurrence: 1. Communicate this incident to all affected personnel 2. Replace missing or damaged insulation on the steam header 3. Evaluate Mud Legs for performance and adequacy 4. Evaluate the need for an inline separator on the 650-lb steam to the WGC 5. Perform an infrared (IR) camera scan of the 650-lb steam header | 47,536.0 pounds |
| 147996 2013-04-08 | 30 TOX stack | Cause: The 30 SRU malfunctioned resulting in excess sulfur dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. Excess emissions were emitted from the 30 TOX stack to the environment and rapidly dispersed. Followup: Yes Notes: The permitted SO2 rate was exceeded and reportable quantity were exceeded for the reporting hour of 11:00. Total SO2 emissions for the reporting hour of 11:00 were approximately 666 lbs., and total SO2 emissions in excess of the permitted limit were 551 lbs. | 670.0 pounds |
| 146729 2013-02-19 | Flares 1, 2, 3, and 4 | Cause: On February 19, 2013, at approximately 04:10, the Diesel Hydrotreating (DHT) Recycle Gas Compressor (K-15-53) malfunctioned resulting in a unit shutdown and a release to the flare of 828 pounds of sulfur dioxide. The GE Multilin relay indicated a short due to apparent moisture intrusion that caused arcing which damaged the insulators and cables. Heavy rain was in the area at the time of the incident. Followup: Yes Notes: Safely shutdown the DHT. No pollutants were recouped. Emissions were minimized by restarting the recycle gas compressor. The cables were repaired and the insulators were replaced. A cover for the capacitor cabinet was fabricated to cover the holes due to rust which allowed water inside to prevent any further damage from inclement weather. To prevent recurrence, the following procedures have or will be adopted: 1) Communicate this incident to all affected personnel. 2) Replace the existing cabinet on the next turn-around. 3) Modify the existing roof/cover to provide better protection from inclement weather. (A temporary repair was already completed.) 4) Survey similar cabinets for damage and make required repairs and/or replacements. 5) Establish preventative maintenance program for similar cabinets plant-wide. 6) Determine the necessity of the capacitors for K-15-53 and either replace or remove them. 7) Improve effectiveness of and/or training on the maintenance work process to ensure that repair findings/discovery scope during the course of work that is not addressed at the time is captured in a work order. 8) Draft an emergency operating procedure to address the loss of the recycle compressor. SO2 reportable quantities were exceeded. A report was issued on 4/19/2013 stating that Valero was "unable to complete the investigation within 60-days of the above referenced incident". | 828.3 pounds |
| 146196 2013-01-21 | Flare 1 and 2 | Cause: The wet gas compressor in the delayed coking unit had malfunctioned.
The Wet Gas Compressor (WGC) malfunction resulted from a malfunctioning lube oil turbine. The nigh prior to the incident, the lube oil turbine tripped. The backup electric pump started in "auto" to control the lube oil pressure. We restarted the lube oil turbine but were unable to shutdown the backup electric pump with the switch in 'auto'. We verified that the lube oil pressure was stable and then shutdown the electric pump. The lube oil turbine then tripped on overspeed and when we switched the backup electric pump from 'off' to 'auto' it did not restart causing the WGC compressor to trip from low lube oil pressure. We determined that the electric pump did not restart because it received a single pulse start signal that was sent before the pump was put in 'auto' causing it not to register. Additionally, the original overspeed trip was due to scoring on the Fischer actuator due to its tendency to side load. The scored piston caused the actuator to stick resulting in a lack of speed control. Followup: Yes Notes: The maximum hourly permitted emissions for hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide at flares 1 and 2 were exceeded. The reportable quantity for sulfur dioxide was also exceeded. Emissions were minimized by restarting the wet gas compressor. Gas from the coker was combusted in Flare 1 and Flare 2, and the resulting combustion byproducts rapidly dispersed. | 5,558.7 pounds |
| 159934 2014-11-09 | Hydrocracker-Hydrotreater | Cause: On 11/9/14 at approximately 21:30 hours, the Hydrotreater-Hydrocracker (HTHC) Recycle Compressor malfunctioned, which initiated a shutdown of HTHC and led to a reportable quantity of sulfur dioxide. The cause of the malfunction is under investigation. Followup: No Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down and then restarting the HTHC unit. Air monitoring was conducted in the downstream wind direction within and around the refinery. The incident is still under investigation to determine preventative measures. | 1,597.8 pounds |
| 158089 2014-08-15 | 3h 6m | Cause: On August 15, 2014, electrical feed from a power substation tripped offline, causing multiple units to shutdown. An investigation of the incident found the cause to be the failure of a sudden pressure relay on transformer T-3 at the PS-2 substation. This provided a false trip input into the transformer differential relay. The relay logic reacted to the input by isolating the transformer, thus de-energizing power to Buss 3, which shut down several pieces of equipment. Maximum hourly permitted emissions rates for sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and volatile organic compounds from Flare 1 were exceeded.
Neither report includes emissions totals for hydrogen sulfide. Followup: Yes Notes: At the time of the accident, Valero energized an alternate source of power to supply the equipment. The Diesel Hydrotreater (DHT), Naptha Hydrotreater (NHT), and Continuous Catalytic Reformer (CCR) Units tripped off-line. Valero left them down until reliable power was restored. The FCCU and Crude Units reduced rates to minimize emissions. Flare gas recovery remained in operation to recover some of the gases sent to the flare header. A Root Cause Analysis identified several corrective actions to be taken by Valero, including: 1) Communicate the incident to affected personnel (Estimated completion date: 10/31/14), 2) Work with Electrical Safety and Reliability network (ESARN) to develop a recommendation for routine testing/inspection of sudden pressure relays on transformers(Estimated completion date: 12/31/14), 3) Develop a list of refinery substations that would benefit from MAIN-TIE-MAIN auto transfer scheme and prioritize implementation (Estimated completion date: 12/31/14), 4) Review the power source for refinery analyzers and develop a prioritized list of analyzers that would benefit from moving from a Purchased Power source to a UPS source (Estimated completion date: 12/31/14), 5) Develop a written guideline for restorations of power for the refinery following power loss scenarios at Prospect and Good Hope Substations (estimated completion date: 12/31/14). | 6,400.0 pounds |
| 157998 2014-08-12 | 3700 SRU | Cause: On 8/12/14 at approximately 10:30 hrs, the 3700 SRU reaction furnace tripped, which led to a reportable quantity of sulfur dioxide (SO2) from the 3700 TOX. The cause of the trip as a controller logic script that auto initiated and propagated an incorrect flow measurement to the Combustion Air Blowers (K-37-391 A and B). The incorrect flow measurement caused the blower control scheme to falsely assume surge operating conditions and correspondingly the atmospheric discharge vent opened. When the discharge vent opened, it significantly reduced the combustion air flow to the reaction furnace which initiated a Safety Instrumented System trip of the unit. Followup: No Notes: Emissions were minimized by transferring SRU feed to other operating trains, until the 3700 SRU was restarted. The following corrective actions were taken: 1) Review the incident with all affected personnel 2) Determine if a two second delay to blower anti-surge logic to accommodate bad flow indication should be programmed into the logic 3) Remove all custom scripts from host computers 4) Update the CSE Change Approval Matrix to include additional QA/QC procedures. | 590.2 pounds |
| 157325 2014-07-09 | EQT 0360 Flare No. 4 | Cause: The Hydrotreater/Hydrocracker (HTHC) recycle compressor malfunctioned, which initiated a shutdown of the HTHC and led to a reportable quantity of sulfur dioxide. The cause of the malfunction is under investigation while the unit is being repaired. Permitted emissions for H2S, VOC and SO2 was exceeded for 1 hour.
The unit depressured in approximately 15 minutes, however, due to the excess production of hydrogen following the HTHC shutdown, Valero continued to flare hydrogen. Valero submitted a Notification of Case by Case insignificant activity on July 11, 2014 to cover emissions from Hydrogen flaring; therefore, hydrogen flaring was not considered within the duration of this event.
Valero exceeded hourly permitted emissions for hydrogen sulfide, volatile organic compounds and sulfur dioxide at Flare 4 for one hour. Followup: Yes Notes: Shutdown of HTHC unit. Air monitoring was conducted downwind of the refinery. No procedures or preventive measures given at the time of the report. Follow up report lists the following measures identified to prevent recurrence: 1) Review this incident with affected personnel and attach sign off sheet 2) Investigate installing knock out put upstream on dry gas seal (DGS) panel inlet filters with continuous blowdown 3) Investigate the need for level indication and drains on the make-up gas (MUG) discharge pulsation dampers 4) Use recycle gas to supply panel when sufficient differential pressure is available and modify procedures accordingly 5) Evaluate the functionality of the TriLogger system and determine if upgrades are needed 6) Review the lubrication program for HTHC compressors 7) Run drain lines from the dry gas seal panel filters to a safe location for liquid removal | 1,597.7 pounds |
| 157159 2014-07-01 | 3700 Sulfur Recover Unit | Cause: The 3700 Sulfur Recover Unit (SRU) furnace main air safety shutdown valve closed unexpectedly, which initiated a 3700 SRU trip and led to excess emissions of sulfur dioxide. While troubleshooting the malfunction, operators shifted the amine acid gas feed (AAG) from 3700 SRU to two remaining units (1600 and 30 SRU). The move caused excess emissions from the 30 SRU while stabilization was in process. About 30 minutes later, the malfunctioning valve reopened, reintroducing AAG into SRU 3700 and causing a RQ emission for sulfur dioxide.
Later in the same day, at approximately 20:45 the 3700 SRU reaction furnace main air safety shutdown valve closed again. After the second malfunction, Valero purposely shut down the 3700 SRU in order to further troubleshoot the issue, and then implemented sulfur shedding in order to reduce sulfur loading to the SRUs. Sulfur shedding included: decreasing throughput of the Hydro-Treater, Hydro-Cracker (HTHC) unit to minimum rates, reducing overall refinery crude throughput, shifting amine acid gas feed to the two remaining operating SRUs (1600 and 30 SRUs), and shutting down sour water acid gas feed (SWAG) to the remaining two SRUs. The quick shift in AAG feed to the remaining two SRUs resulted in excess emissions from the 30 and 1600 SRUs for approximately 1 hour while making the necessary adjustments for the increased AAG loading to the units.
The additional loading at the 30 SRU caused the 30 Thermal Oxidizer (TOX) to trip offline at 21:52 hrs due to low oxygen for combustion. It was brought back online at approximately 23:32. However, during the outage Valero experienced elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions from the 30 TOX. When the 30 TOX tripped, they had trouble restarting it due to wires that were found to be corroded and detached from the terminated position. The wire was tied to a system that was needed to complete the logic to start the TOX. The corroded wires were repaired, the termination box was properly sealed and the TOX was restarted.
An investigation into the SRU 3700 reaction furnace main air safety shutdown valve malfunction revealed a loose wire as the cause. Valero repaired it, restarted the 3700 SRU, and resumed normal operation. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the 3700 and reducing the feed to upstream operating units. Subsequently, repairing and restarting the 3700 SRU reduced sulfur loading on the 30 and 1600 SRU, which allowed those units to resume normal operation. Air monitoring was conducted in the downstream wind direction within and around the refinery, and no detectable SO2 or H2S was found using portable air monitoring equipment. The following corrective actions were identified: 1) Review the incident with all affected personnel 2) Review the requirement to evaluate the condition of the sealing system of any instrument enclosure that is opened while performing any maintenance task associated with routine or preventative maintenance 3) Remove the logic for the 30 SRU atomizing stream valve from the purge permissive and pilot permissive. | 21.7 pounds |
| 156618 2014-06-09 | 1600 SRU Tail Gas Treater Unit | Cause: The refinery experienced an upset in the 3700 sulfur recovery unity (SRU) which resulted in excess SO2 emissions. The 1600 SRU Tail Gas Treater Unit (TGTU) amine regenerator column overflowed sending rich amine to the thermal oxidizer (TOX), which cause it to trip offline. A similar incident occurred in the 3700 SRU. Rich amine from the 3700 SRU regenerator clump overflowed, shutting down both the 3700 SRU inline mixer and TOX. Both the inline mixer and TOX for the 3700 SRU were restarted but tripped offline again. As a result of the malfunctions in the 1600 and 3700 SRUs both were shut down. The remaining sulfur plan feed was routed to the still operating 30 SRU while the feed was cut to all upstream operating process units in order to reduce sulfur loading. The malfunction in the 1600 SRU led to excess SO2 and H2S emissions from the unit's TOX before shutting down. The TOX trip at the 3700 SRU led to excess H2S emissions from the 3700 SRU. Excess feed to the 30 SRY resulting from the shutdown of the 1600 and 3700 SRU led to excess emissions SO2 emissions from the 30 SRU TOX. During the shutdown the TOX tripped offline for short duration periods on multiple occasions which led to excess H2S emissions from the 3700 and 1600 SRUs. Followup: Notes: Emissions were minimized by shutting down the 3700 and 1600 SRUs and reducing feed to upstream operating units. Subsequently, repairing and restarting the 1600 SRU reduced sulfur loading on the 30 SRU, which caused it to resume operation. The limits were exceeded and final calculations are pending and will be reported in a follow- up letter. | |
| 155645 2014-04-30 | Flares 1, 2, 3 Flare 1 | Cause: The fluid cat cracking unit (FCCU) wet gas compressor shut down due to a loss of power that resulted from a transformer short circuit and a circuit breaker malfunction. As a result, flaring occurred from permitted flares 1, 2 and 3. Workers reduced total feed and reactor temperature in the FCCU to minimize flaring until compressors could be restarted.
Transformer failed in the EP-03A substation. A relay setting associated with this system was not set properly and allowed the fault current to reach the Good Hope Substation. The fault was cleared by the breaker at the Good Hope Substation. As a result, several other transformers also tripped and upset the FCCU.
This accident exceeded maximum hourly permitted emissions for sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, hexane, and Volatile Organic Compounds at Flare 1 for one hour. Maximum hourly permitted emissions were also exceeded for NOx and carbon monoxide at Flare 2 for one hour. Maximum hourly permitted emissions for sulfur dioxide and Volatile Organic Compounds at Flare 2 for 5 hours. Reportable quantities for sulfur dioxide and propylene were exceeded. Followup: Yes Notes: At the time of the accident, emissions were minimized by reducing the overall rate to the unit and reactor temperature. Operators responded by adjusting the power distribution system in order to reestablish the poewr source and restart the compressors. Throughout the event, the Flare Gas Recovery Unit remained in operation to reduce the amount of flared gas. Process changes have been implemented as corrective actions. These include: - updated relay settings - refinery arch flash study and relay setting review - even distribution of four P82-808 pumps across the electrical feed buses - modify MOC checklist to include relay settings and coordination curves - modify PSSR checklist to include relay settings and coordination curves - require all new or changed relay setting requested through CSE with relay setting/coordination curve request form - communicate incident to affected personnel - communicate incident and path forward to CSE electrical engineers, MP electrical engineers and maintenance electrical supervision | 1,645.2 |
| 155480 2014-04-23 | Flare 1, Flare 2, and Flare 3 | Cause: Valero experienced flaring from Flares No. 1, 3, and 4 when Coker Wet Gas Compressor (WGC) malfunctioned during a planned shut down. During the shut down the flow to the WGC increased when the sponge oil absorber was emptied. The emptied oil absorber increased the load to the 1st stage suction of the compressor, which caused the turbine speed to increase to compensate for the additional load. Later that evening, an operator heard gas going through LV-53-505 on the Sponge Oil Absorber and requested console operator to close the valve in order to decrease compressor loading. However, the valve was closed too quickly, which caused the WGC to trip offline and gases to be routed to the flare system.
Report states that flares are "permitted for planned startup/shutdown operations in addition to flare operating limits". Those increased permit limits for each flare are included in the report.
This accident resulted in the exceedance of the maximum hourly permitted emissions for hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide, the 3-hour rolling average for hydrogen sulfide in the West Plant and CCR Fuel Gas and the reportable quantity for sulfur dioxide. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by completing the shut down of the Coker Unit. Additionally the flare gas recovery unit collected and rerouted some of the gases back to refinery fuel gas. The following corrective actions have ben identified to prevent recurrence: Communicate incident to affect personal (Estimation completion date 7/31/140 Edit the Coker shutdown SOP to include a warning about high suction pressure/ high RPM scenario (Est. Completion date 7/31/14) Modify the distributed control system to display a warning when the compressor is approach a high suction pressure/high RM state (Est. Completion date 7/31/14) In addition to communicating the incident to all Coker personal, review the specifics with shift supervisors, console operators, and set up operators. Focus this communication on recognizing that gas flow through a liquid valve is unusual and may require cautious, measured moves to correct (Est. Completion date 7/31/14) Guardian OST. (Est. Completion date 6/20/14) Develop a WGC training overview for operators and supervisors (Est. Completion date 8/31/14) Review alarm points (Est. Completion date 7/31/14) Start monthly "what if" drills on the compressor operation (Est. Completion date 7/31/14) There is no record that any of these corrective actions have be mandated or not and the plan of action did not take into consideration of notifying the nearby communities. | 6,868.5 pounds |
| 153767 2014-02-09 | SMR 1 Heater No. 2, 2005-8 (H001 1st Stage Charge Heater), 2005-9 (H002 2nd Stage Charge Heater), 2005-10 (H003 1st Fractionator Charge Heater), 94-GDU (Low SUlfur Gasoline Unit Heater), 2005-1 (crude Heater F-72-704), 2005-2 (Vacuum Heater F-52-02) | Cause: On Febuary 9, 2014, at approximately 18:44 hrs, the lean amine return pump (P-16-204A) tripped offline unexpectedly due to high temperature, which led to flooding of the regenerator column and subsequent downstream amine acid has (AAG) knockout vessels. The AAG knockout vessels reached full capacity, which caused the sulfur recovery units (SRUs) to trip offline. Consequently, we were unable to regenerate our amine used for scrubbing sulfur from refinery fuel gas. As this fuel gas was burned in various process heaters within the refinery, the sulfur was converted and emitted to the atmosphere as SO2. Furthermore, as we recovered from the incident, elevated SO2 emissions were observed during the subsequent startup of the 1600 SRU. Followup: Yes Notes: Emissions were minimized by reducing unit throughputs until the SRUs could be restarted. Air monitoring was conducted in the downstream wind direction with no detected SO2 or H2S readings by the handheld monitor. The procedures/measures adopted to prevent recurrence of this accident are two-fold: 1. Review this incident with affected personnel focusing on shutting down the unit when discharge flow cannot be reestablished in a timely manner and consideration for the response time available in lost flow situations (Completed -- 03/12/2014). 2. Develop "what if" scenarios for employees to use (Completed -- 03/01/2014). Hydrogen Sulfide emissions were calculated assuming a 99.5% conversion of SO2 to H2S in process heaters and excluding H2S emissions resulting from Sulfur Recovery Units which were less than permitted H2S emissions for the accident. | 9,923.0 pounds |
| 153607 2014-01-29 | Flares 1 and 2 | Cause: On January 29, 2014, the Valero St. Charles Refinery (Valero) experienced flaring when the pressure on the Naphtha Surge Drum and the Wet Gas Compressor (WGC) Interstage Drum increased. The pressure controller on the Naphtha Surge Drum malfunctioned due to cold temperatures, which caused the level to rise in the drum. As a result, the level in the Compressor Interstage Drum, which is downstream of the Naphtha Surge Drum, increased and caused the WGC to trip. The pressure controller on the Naphtha Surge Drum was bypassed to the flare header in order to control high levels on additional upstream and downstream vessels with the unit. Flaring stopped after the level in the Compressor Interstage Drum was decreased and the WGC was restarted.
Temperatures were below 30degF on the morning of the incident. It was found that the steam tracing on the pressure controller on the naphtha surge drum was not in contact with the valve and insulation blankets were not in place. The lack of steam tracing and insulation exposed the valve to cold temperatures, which caused it to malfunction. Followup: Yes Notes: The event was secured by reducing the level in the compressor interstage drum and restarting the WGC. Additionally, the Flare Gas Recovery Unit remained in operation to reduce the amount of flared gas. The following corrective measures have been identified to prevent recurrence: 1. Review this incident with affected personnel. 2. Review and revise as need the freeze protection guidelines. 3-7. Create a pre-winter checklist to identify and correct tracing and insulation issues for Complexes I-V. 8. Repair the steam tracing and insulation for PCV-53-471, LV-53-472, LV-53-020, and LV-53-038. The Reportable Quantity for SO2 was exceeded. | 5,784.0 pounds |
Connect With Us: